Both Reserved Instances and Savings Plans exist to do the same thing: reduce your AWS compute bill in exchange for a 1 or 3-year commitment. Both can cut costs by up to 72% compared to On-Demand. The difference is in what you're committing to — and that determines which one fits your workload.
The Core Difference
Reserved Instances (RIs) commit to a specific instance type in a specific region. You're saying: "I will run an m5.xlarge in us-east-1 for the next year." In return, AWS gives you the deepest possible discount.
Savings Plans commit to a spend amount per hour — not to a specific instance. You're saying: "I will spend at least $X/hr on compute for the next year." AWS applies the discount automatically to whatever compute you actually run.
The tradeoff: RIs are less flexible but can offer a slightly higher discount on EC2 and RDS. Savings Plans are more flexible and cover services RIs never will.
The Three Options Compared
| Standard RI | EC2 Savings Plan | Compute Savings Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max discount | Up to 72% | Up to 72% | Up to 66% |
| Commitment | Instance type + region | Spend/hr, one region | Spend/hr, any region |
| Covers EC2 | Yes (exact family) | Yes (any family) | Yes (any family) |
| Covers RDS / Aurora | Yes | No | No |
| Covers Fargate | No | No | Yes |
| Covers Lambda | No | No | Yes |
| Can sell unused | Yes (Marketplace) | No | No |
| Flexibility | Low | Medium | High |
The key insight on RDS: Savings Plans do not cover RDS or Aurora. If you have predictable database workloads, Standard RIs are still the right tool — there is no Savings Plan equivalent for managed databases.
Decision Guide
Use Standard Reserved Instances when:
- You have stable EC2 or RDS usage — same instance type, same region, 1+ years
- You need the maximum possible discount and flexibility is not a concern
- You run RDS or Aurora and want to reduce that specific cost
Use EC2 Instance Savings Plans when:
- Your workload is EC2-only but you might change instance families (e.g.,
m5tom6i) - You want near-RI discounts without being locked to a specific instance type
- Your compute is region-specific but not instance-family-specific
Use Compute Savings Plans when:
- Your stack includes Fargate, Lambda, or both
- You run workloads across multiple regions
- Instance types change frequently or traffic is unpredictable enough that you want flexibility over max discount
- You're moving from EC2 to serverless — Compute SP covers the transition period
Stay On-Demand when:
- Usage is genuinely unpredictable and short-lived (experiments, burst workloads)
- You're in the first few months of a new product and don't know your baseline yet
How to Size Your Commitment
The most common mistake: buying RIs or Savings Plans to cover 100% of current usage. Don't.
Target 70–80% coverage. Your baseline steady-state usage should be commitment-covered. The remaining 20–30% — spikes, experiments, scaling events — stays On-Demand. This prevents over-committing on capacity you end up not needing.
Check your current coverage in Cost Explorer:
# Check Savings Plans coverage (last 30 days)
aws ce get-savings-plans-coverage \
--time-period Start=2026-02-24,End=2026-03-26 \
--granularity MONTHLY \
--query 'SavingsPlansCoverages[*].{Coverage:Coverage.CoverageHoursPercentage}'
# Check RI coverage for EC2
aws ce get-reservation-coverage \
--time-period Start=2026-02-24,End=2026-03-26 \
--granularity MONTHLY \
--group-by Type=DIMENSION,Key=INSTANCE_TYPEIf coverage is below 60%, you're leaving significant savings on the table. If it's above 85%, you may be over-committed.
Payment Options
Both RIs and Savings Plans offer three payment options:
- All Upfront — highest discount, pay the full 1 or 3-year cost today
- Partial Upfront — mid-tier discount, pay some now and the rest monthly
- No Upfront — lowest discount, pay monthly (still cheaper than On-Demand)
The break-even for All Upfront vs No Upfront is typically 7–8 months. If you're confident about the commitment, All Upfront pays for itself before the year is out.
For 3-year terms: the discount jump from 1-year to 3-year is meaningful (~10–15% additional), but only commit to 3 years if you're certain about the workload. Architectures change.
Practical Starting Point
If you're new to this and don't know where to start:
- Run Cost Explorer for 30 days and look at your Savings Plans → Recommendations tab — AWS calculates exactly how much you'd save based on your actual usage
- Start with a Compute Savings Plan at No Upfront — lowest risk, most flexibility, still 40–60% cheaper than On-Demand
- After 2–3 months of stable usage, revisit with All Upfront or a mix of RI + Savings Plans
# Get AWS's own recommendation for Savings Plans
aws ce get-savings-plans-purchase-recommendation \
--savings-plans-type COMPUTE_SP \
--term-in-years ONE_YEAR \
--payment-option NO_UPFRONT \
--lookback-period-in-days THIRTY_DAYSThis returns a specific hourly commitment amount and the estimated annual savings — no guesswork required.
Quick Reference
| Scenario | Use |
|---|---|
| Steady EC2 + RDS, fixed instance type | Standard RI |
| EC2 only, might change instance family | EC2 Savings Plan |
| EC2 + Fargate + Lambda, mixed regions | Compute Savings Plan |
| Unpredictable or short-lived workloads | On-Demand |
| Don't know yet | Compute SP, No Upfront, 1 year |
Commitments are not set-and-forget — review coverage quarterly. Usage patterns change, and what was optimal 6 months ago may not be today.